Unraveling the influence of kernel row number and cob-related traits on the expression of heterosis in field corn (Zea mays L.)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kernel row number (KRN) is an important agronomic trait of the female inflorescence and it is a significant breeding target. In the investigation, a set of 280 inbred lines derived from multiple disease-resistant pools was characterized for KRN and other cob-related traits. Out of 280 inbred lines, 45 lines differing for KRN were selected and evaluated at two locations and three environments. The inbred lines showed significant variation in yield and yield contributing traits at both locations and all the environments considered for evaluation. The KRN and other traits showed a high phenotypic coefficient of variation (ranged 6.47–24.39), genotypic coefficient of variation (ranged 6.47–24.39), and heritability (ranged 71.5–99.6), which were consistent across environments, suggesting the stability of performance of inbred lines and the possibility of genetic gain through selection for these traits. Further, the contrast inbred lines for the KRN trait were identified, which ranged from 10-12 rows (AI 504, AI 505, AI 515, AI 516, AI 518, and AI 519 low KRN) to 18-24 rows (AI 545, AI 536, AI 537, AI 542, AI 543, and AI 544 high KRN). These selected lines (six lines each) were crossed in a diallel fashion and generated 144 F1 combinations. Hybrids so obtained showed significant variation for KRN and other yield component traits, coupled with significant general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) variances and effects. The ratio of GCA/SCA variance and effect suggested that all the traits, including KRN, are governed by additive gene action. The combinations having low × low KRN have not expressed any significant heterosis, but the cross involving low × high KRN, and high ×high KRN showed significant heterosis for grain yield of hybrids viz., AH-4271, AH-4152, AH-4139, AH-4072, and AH-4039. Hence, the parental lines of these selected hybrids have the potential to improve the productivity of field corn and are also sources for future heterosis breeding programs.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abe A. and Adelegan C.A. 2019. Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance in shrunken-2 super-sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) populations. J Plant Breed and Crop Sci., 11(4): 100-105.
Alexandratos N. and Bruinsma. 2012. Journal World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision; ESA Working paper No. 12–03; FAO: Rome, Italy, 122.
Austin D.F. and Lee M. 1996. Comparative mapping in F2:3 and F6:7 generations of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and yield components in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet., 92: 817–826.
Bello B.O., Ige A.S., Azeez A.M., Afolabi S.M., Abdulmaliq Y.S. and Mahamood J. 2012. Heritability and genetic advance for grain yield and its component characters in maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Plant Research, 2(5): 138-145.
Chiuta E.N. and Mutengwa S.C. 2013. Combining ability of quality protein maize inbred lines for yield and morpho-agronomic traits under optimum as well as combined drought and heat-stressed conditions. Agronomy, 10(184): 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10020184.
Dehghanpour Z. and Ehdaie B. 2013. Stability of general and specific combining ability effects for grain yield in elite Iranian maize inbred lines. J. Crop Improv., 27:137-152. DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2012.745822.
Fujimoto R., Uezono K., Ishikura S., Osabe K.W., Peacock J. and Dennis S.E. 2018. Recent research on the mechanism of heterosis is important for crop and vegetable breeding systems. Breed Sci., 68: 145–158.
Griffing B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 463–493. doi: 10.1071/bi9560463.
Jilo T, Tulu L, Birhan T and Beksisa L. 2018. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines for yield and yield related traits in southwestern Ethiopia. J. Plant Breed and Crop Sci., 10(10): 281-289.
Labroo R.M., Studer J.A. and Rutkoski E.J. 2021. Heterosis and hybrid crop breeding: A multidisciplinary review. Front. Genet., 12: 643761. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643761.
Malvar A.R., Cartea E.M., Revilla P., Butrón A. and Ordas A. 2001. Checking the performance of field corn inbreds as donors of favorable alleles to improve early vigor and adaptation of sweet corn hybrids to European conditions, Maydica, 46: 187-193.
Manivannan N. 2014. TNAUSTAT- Statistical package. Retrieved from https:// sites. Google.com/ site/ tnaustat.
Messmer R., Fracheboud Y., Banziger M., Vargas M., Stamp P. and Ribaut M.J. 2009. Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits. Theor Appl Genet., 119: 913–930.
Ogunniyan D.J. and Olakojo S.A. (2015). Genetic variation, heritability, genetic advance and agronomic character association of yellow elite inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Nigerian Journal of Genetics, 28: 24-28.
Pswarayi A. and Vivek B. 2008. Combining ability amongst CIMMYT’s early maturing maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm under stress and non-stress conditions and identification of testers. Euphytica, 162: 353–362. DOI: 10.1007/ s10681-007-9525-0.
Reddy M.T., Babu K.H., Ganesh M., Begum H., Dilipbabu J. and Reddy R.S.K. 2013. Gene action and combining ability of yield and its components for late Kharif season in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Chilean Journal Agril. Res., 73(1): 9-16.
Ribaut J.M., Jiang C., Gonzalez-de-Leon D., Edmeades G.O. and Hoisington D.A. 1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 2. Yield components and marker assisted selection strategies. Theor Appl Genet., 94: 887–896.
SAS 9.3v. 2013. Vision 2050. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (ICAR), Library Avenue, Pusa, New Delhi-110012. http://stat.iasri.res.in.
Sibiya J., Tongoona P. and Derera J. 2013. Combining ability and GGE biplot analyses for resistance to northern leaf blight in tropical and subtropical elite maize inbred lines. Euphytica, 191: 245–257. doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0 806-x.
Singh B D. 2001. Plant Breeding: Principles and Methods. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi Ludhiana, India, 506.
Singh R.K. and Chaudhary B.D. 2004. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Singh S., Dey S.S., Bhatia R., Kumar R., Sharma K. and Behera T.K. 2019. Heterosis and combining ability in cytoplasmic male sterile and doubled haploid based Brassica oleracea progenies and prediction of heterosis using microsatellites. Plos one, 14(8): e0210772. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0210772.
Sivasubramanian S. and Menon M. 1973. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in rice, Madras Agric. J., 60: 1339.
Sprague G.F. and Tatum L.A. 1942. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Agron. J., 34: 923–932. doi: 10.2134 /agronj1942. 00021962003400100008x.
Wen Y.X. and Zhu J. 2005. Multivariable conditional analysis for complex trait and its components. Acta Genetica Sinica, 32: 289–296.
Xiao Y., Jiang S. and Cheng et al., 2021. The genetic mechanism of heterosis utilization in maize improvement. Genome Biol., 22: 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02370-7.
Yu K., Wang H., Liu X., Xu C., Li Z., Xu X., Liu J., Wang Z. and Xu Y. 2020. Large-Scale analysis of combining ability and heterosis for the development of hybrid maize breeding strategies using diverse germplasm resources. Front. Plant Sci., 11:660. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00660
Zhang J., Wu M., Yu J., Li X. and Pei W. 2016. Breeding potential of introgression lines developed from interspecific crossing between upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Gossypium barbadense: Heterosis, Combining Ability, and Genetic Effects. Pone, 11(1): e0143646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143646.