Developing synthetics as a byproduct of hybrid maize breeding
Main Article Content
Abstract
All-India Coordinated Research Project on maize breeding, established in 1957, started a large-scale multi-parent hybrid breeding and later focused on composite breeding. The improved cultivars did create an impact but not on the expected scale in spite of the development of some outstanding cultivars. Meanwhile, the cultivation of single-cross hybrids became popular in a large number of countries. The breeding programme in India was accordingly reoriented in the late 1980s with an almost exclusive focus on single crosses. These hybrids have created a remarkable impact by accelerating area expansion and yield enhancement in rabi/spring season, but the impact is lower and also variable across regions during kharif. The Project has developed and recommended 35 cultivars of field corn during 5 years (2017-2021) for cultivation during kharif. These include nine composites (including improved locals) meant for the states generally having difficult ecologies and resource-constrained farmers. Evidently, some centers are working on hybrid and composite breeding, and thus are practically conducting two independent breeding programmes. In such situations, an alternative is breeding synthetic varieties rather than undertaking population improvement, as an adjunct of single-cross breeding. Synthetics, being genotypically heterogeneous populations, are expected to have higher stability of performance than genotypically homogenous single-cross hybrids. These also have the advantage that farmers can produce seed at their own level, which is expected to enable synthetics to have a place in some constrained ecologies in the transient phase. However, single-cross breeding should continue to be the ultimate goal as single crosses have the highest performance potential among various cultivar types.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Allard R.W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Allard R.W. and Bradshaw A.D. 1964. Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci., 4: 503-507
Anonymous. 2023. Quinquennial Review Team Report (2017-2021): Indian Institute of Maize Research and All India Coordinated Research Project on Maize. ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana
Carena M.J. 2005. Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica, 141: 201- 208
Dhillon B.S. and Malhi N.S. 2006. Maize breeding in India – retrospective analysis and prospects. Indian J. of Plant Genet. Res., 19: 327-345
Dhillon B.S., Malhi N.S., Saxena V.K., Kapoor W.R., Pal S.S. and Singh M. 1995. 'Paras' – first single cross hybrid of maize in India. J. Res., Punjab agric. Univ., 32: 238-39.
Dhillon B.S., Malhi N.S., Saxena V.K. and Khehra A.S. 1986. Hico breeding in maize. In: New Frontiers in Breeding Researches (ed. B. Napompeth and S. Subhadrabandhu). Kasetsart Univ., Bangkok, Thailand: 279–285.
Dhillon B.S. and S.K. Sandhu. 2023a. Maize composite Vijay: A landmark variety. Maize Journal, 12: 1-3
Dhillon B.S. and Sandhu S.K. 2023b. Role of landmark single-cross hybrids of 1990s in the reorientation of Indian maize breeding programme. Agric. Res. Journal, 60: 765-767
Dhillon B.S., Sharma A.K., Kumar D., Malhi N.S. and Singh N.N. 2006. Maize. In: Plant Genetic Resources: Foodgrain Crops (ed. B.S. Dhillon, S. Saxena, A. Agrawal and R.K. Tyagi). Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi: 90-136
Dhillon B.S. and Sohu V. S. 2024. Climate change shocks and crop production: the foodgrain bowl of India as an example. Indian J. Agron. (Revised submitted)
Gallais A. 1990. Theoretical determination of the optimum number of parents for synthetics. Theor. Appl. Genet., 79: 417-21.
Hayes H.K. and Garber R.J. 1919. Synthetic production of high protein corn in relation to breeding. J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 36: 998-1000
Jaradat A.A., Goldstein W. and Dashiell K. 2010. Phenotypic structures and breeding value of open-pollinated corn varietal hybrids. Intern. J. of Plant Breed., 4: 37-46
Kaul J., Dass S., Manivannan A., Singode A., Sekhar J.C., Chikkappa G.K. and Parkash O. 2010. Maize hybrid and composite varieties released in India (1961-2010) (3rd Edition). Directorate of Maize Research, Pusa Campus, New Delhi - 110 012. Technical Bulletin No. 2010/3, pp. 80.
Khehra A.S., Dhillon B.S., Malhi N.S., Pal S.S., Saxena V.K. and Malhotra V.V. 1986. Reciprocal recurrent selection for multitrait indices in maize. Euphytica, 35: 817-822
Khehra A.S., Sohoo M.S., Saxena V.K., Dhillon B.S., Malhi N.S., Bhardwaj B.L., Kapoor W.R., Beri S.M., Pal S.S. and Malhotra V.V. 1990. ‘J1006’ - a new composite of fodder maize. J. Res., Punjab agric. Univ., 27: 381
Kinman M.L. and Sprague G.F. 1945. Relation between number of parental lines and theoretical performance of synthetic varieties of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 27: 341-351
Kutka F.J. and Smith M.E. 2007. How many parents give the highest yield in predicted synthetic and composite populations of maize? Crop Sci., 47: 1905-1913
NCA. 1973. Maize: Report of the Study Team of National Commission on Agriculture, New Delhi
Singh B., Gautam N.K., Mahajan R.K., Pant K.C., Pandravada S.R., Hore D.K. and Rana R.S. 1995. Evaluation of indigenous maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi