Genetic analysis for morphological, quality and biofuel related traits in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Main Article Content

Farrag F.B. Abu-Ellail
Zeinab E. Ghareeb
Ahmed E. Attia

Abstract

The present investigation was aimed to study the relationship between different methods of diallel data analysis of ethanol yield traits in sweet sorghum to select the relevant superior genotypes. Half-diallel hybrid analysis revealed that both general and specific combining abilities were significant for all the traits studied but the specific combining ability (SCA) was higher than the general combining ability (GCA), suggesting that the non-additive gene action is more important than additive one in controlling the studied traits. Graphically, traits of juice extraction percent, juice yield, and stripped stalk yield were most correlated with ethanol yield. Griffing and GT-biplot analyses produced equivalent results for GCA and SCA and were useful in estimating gene action by identifying the superior crosses across all the correlated traits and comparing the genotypes based on multiple traits. For the ethanol yield trait, genotype, Rio showed good GCA and was considered the best combiner parent, while crosses, Sugar Drib× Ramada and Sugar Drib × Honey may be used for the selection of the relevant traits in sorghum breeding programs to improve ethanol yield trait.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abu-Ellail, F. F., Ghareeb, Z. E. ., & Attia, A. E. . (2023). Genetic analysis for morphological, quality and biofuel related traits in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 83(04), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.31742/ISGPB.83.4.7
Section
Research Article
Author Biography

Farrag F.B. Abu-Ellail, Department of Breeding and Genetics, Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics

References

Aman, S.A.K., Kumar, S., Sharma, M. and Gupta, N. 2022. Genetic variability and character association studies in urdbean (Vigna mungo L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions of Jammu region. Annals of Agricultural Research, 2: 179-188.

Anonymous. 2021. In: pulses revolution-from food to nutritional security, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (DAC &FW). Krishi Bhavan: Govt. of India., pp.1

Arya, P., Gaibriyal, M.L. and Sapna, S.L. 2017. Correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in blackgram (Vigna mungo). International Journal of Advanced Biological Research, 7(2): 382-386.

Babu, A., Kamala, V., Sivaraj, N., Sunil, N., Pandravada, S.R., Vanaja, M. and Varaprasad, K.S. 2010. DIVA-GIS approaches for diversity assessment of pod characteristics in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Current Science, 98(5): 616-619.

Bal, S. and Lal, G.M. 2021. Study on Genetic Variability and Selection Strategy for Enhancing Productivity in Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). International Journal of Plant and Environment, 7(2): 152-156.

Chowdhury, T., Das, A., Mandal, G.S., Bhattacharya, S. and Chatterjee, S. 2020. Genetic Variability, Character Association and Divergence Study in Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L). Hepper]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(2): 1726-1734.

Gawhane, A.B., Girase, V.S. and Andhale, G.R. 2021. Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Local Grown Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) Genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10(12): 268-275.

Goswami, B., Dubey, R.B., Dalip and Choudhary, J.R. 2022. Genetic diversity analysis for seed yield and its component characters in urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 51(2): 223-228.

Hadimani, A., Konda, C.R., Nidagundi, J.M. and Patil, R. 2016. Genetic diversity analysis in Black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) based on quantitative traits. Green Farming, 3: 598-601.

Islam, M., Rahman, S., Malek, M., Ahmed, I. and Jahan, T. 2019. Characterization and diversity of blackgram germplasm. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 44(2): 239-251.

Kumar, G.V., Vanaja, M., Lakshmi, N.J. and Maheshwari, M. 2015. Studies of variability, heritability and genetic advance for quantitative traits in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Agriculture Research Journal, 52(4): 28-31.

Kuralarasan, V., Vanniarajan, C., Kanchanam S., Veni, K. and Lavanya, S.A. 2018. Genetic divergence, heritability and genetic advance in mutant lines of urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Legume Research, 41(6): 833-83.

Mahalanobis, P.C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, 2: 49-55.

Punia, S.S., Gautam, N.K., Baldev, R., Verma, P., Dheer, M., Jain, N.K., Koli, N.R., Mahavar, R. and Jat, V.S. 2014. Genetic variability and correlation studies in urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Legume Research, 37(6): 580-584.

Rao, C.R. 1952. Advance statistical methods in biometrical Research 1st Edition., John Willey and Sons, New York.

Sharma, S.R., Parihar, A.K., Singh, D., Varshney, N., Chhagan, L., Sharma, V. and Khedari, O.P. 2018. Genetic components and traits relationship in a panel of a (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) diverse genotypes. Journal of Food Legumes, 31(1): 10-14.

Singh, M., Swarup, I., Billore, M. and Chaudhari, P.R. 2016. Association analysis of seed yield and its attributing traits in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Agricultural Science Digest-A Research Journal, 36(2): 83-87.

Sohel, M.H., Miah, M.R., Mohiuddin, S.J., Islam, A.K.M.S., Rahman, M.M. and Haque, M.A. 2016. Correlation and Path coefficient analysis in urdbean (Vigna mungo L.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 7(02):

- 629.

Vidya, S. S., Sabesan, T. and Saravanan, K. 2018. Genetic divergence studies in urd bean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] for yield and quantitative traits. Journal of Phytology, 10: 24-26.

Yohan, Y., Sudhakar, P., Umamabesh, V., Reddy, D.M. and Sumathi, V. 2018. Evaluation of blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) genotypes for growth parameters under imposed moisture stress conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(6): 981-986.